Reported through Jun 30, 2026. Snapshot downloaded Sep 15, 2026.View 2024 cycle →
BEYOND THE FUNDING TOTAL
Accountability record
Accountability coverage for Daniel Crenshaw. The same FEC matching rules apply to every candidate in the indexed financial snapshots. Records span years beyond the 2026 funding cycle. Campaign respondents and personal conduct are identified separately.
5,759 candidates checked · 7,669 FEC case titles scanned · retrieved Sep 15, 2026 · limited name matching
Campaign respondent: DAN CRENSHAW FOR CONGRESS C00660795 ↗
Matched by complete committee name, verified against the case respondent list. The legal index itself does not supply candidate IDs.
Conciliation: Pre Probable Cause
Respondents: Dan Crenshaw for Congress; Kilgore, Paul
$42,000.00Penalty shown for this respondent group
These are the FEC’s disposition labels. Closing a file does not establish guilt; a “reason to believe” decision is a procedural threshold. Repeated amounts for the same respondent group are shown once. Amounts across case numbers can overlap and must not be added.
Source retrieved Sep 15, 2026. This index does not review later litigation, reopening, or enforcement of the agreement.
Reviewed investigations & context
Supplementary source review
Partial review · includes broader investigations and context for selected FEC matters above · do not add these counts together
Federal Election Commission · MUR 8030
Campaign accepted excessive and prohibited contributions
Civil settlement
Action date
Nov 2, 2022
Conduct period
2020 election cycle
Who the record concerns
Dan Crenshaw for Congress and Paul Kilgore, in his official capacity as treasurer
Conduct described in the record
The agreement describes $207,360.20 in excessive contributions and $16,100 in apparent prohibited corporate and LLC contributions accepted by the campaign.
Outcome / procedural status
The FEC accepted a conciliation agreement requiring a $42,000 civil penalty, cessation of the violations, and compliance training for the treasurer. The file was closed.
$42,000Civil penalty agreed by campaign and treasurer
The respondent was the campaign and its treasurer, not Crenshaw personally. The agreement records refunds and redesignations, including later corrections. This was a civil settlement before a probable-cause finding, not a criminal conviction.
What “civil settlement” means
A civil matter resolved by agreement. Read the record for admissions, terms, and which respondent agreed.
Reported receipts$2.7M
All incoming funds, including transfers
Reported spending$3.2M
Disbursements, including transfers
Cash on hand$24.9K
At the end of the reporting period
Debts owed$36.5K
Outstanding reported obligations
WHERE CONTRIBUTIONS COME FROM
The funding mix
$2,096,954.41Total reported contributions
Individuals$1,458,544.3169.6%
Other political committees$638,410.130.4%
The candidate$00.0%
Party committees$00.0%
Inside individual contributions
Itemized$1,098,792.94
Unitemized$359,751.37
Unitemized is a disclosure category, not a count of small donors.
Contributions exclude loans, transfers, and other receipts. Committee contributions include PACs and other political committees. See definitions ↗
BEYOND CONTRIBUTIONS
Loans, transfers & refunds
These categories help explain why total receipts differ from contributions.
Transfers from authorized committees
$523,632.52
Candidate loans
$0
Other loans
$0
Transfers to authorized committees
$5,105.56
Individual contribution refunds
$314,376.35
Committee contribution refunds
$54,300
Receipts and spending can include money moved between a candidate’s own committees. Refunds are listed separately; contributions above are gross reported amounts.
FOLLOW THE PAPER TRAIL
Committee contribution records
The latest matching record from each of up to 12 committees, ordered by transaction date. Each amount is a single reported transaction, not that committee’s total giving. Filings may include amendments, memo entries, and negative adjustments.
Recent committee contribution records for Daniel Crenshaw
Source: FEC committee-to-candidate files, downloaded Sep 15, 2026. Reporting committee names come from the committee registry. These records exclude independent expenditures and do not reconcile to candidate-reported receipts. Selection methodology ↗