TOWNSEND SIX CORPORATION
Organization reported by filer$1,000,0001 qualifying receipt
contribution · Amount received by the outside group, not attributed to this candidate.
WHO PAID WHO
Opening the public record…
Preparing the campaign financials.
Preparing the campaign financials.
FEC candidate H8TX02166 · 2025–2026 reporting period
See what the campaign received alongside money other groups spent to elect or defeat Daniel Crenshaw.
Received by the campaign
$2,096,954.41Spent to support this candidate
$1,070,918.8Spent to oppose this candidate
$408,612Separate measures, not an additive total. Campaign: reported through jun 30, 2026. Outside spending: processed periodic filings retrieved Sep 23, 2026; recent 24/48-hour notices may not yet appear. Amounts are net reported spending; negative amounts reflect reported adjustments.
Select a group to inspect its spending. The map shows up to four leading spenders per position; the full list is below. Connections show the reported position, not money paid to the candidate.
| Spender | Supports | Opposes | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| FIGHT TO WIN AMERICA, INC. | $824,510 | $0 | FEC records |
| ALAMO FREEDOM FIGHTERS PAC | $0 | $408,612 | FEC records |
| PATRIOTIC FUND, INC. | $231,915 | $0 | FEC records |
| NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE | $13,008 | $0 | FEC records |
| MONTGOMERY COUNTY FIRST PAC | $738.68 | $0 | FEC records |
| REPUBLICAN VOTERS OF TEXAS PAC | $693.41 | $0 | FEC records |
| TEXAS ALLIANCE FOR LIFE FED PAC | $53.71 | $0 | FEC records |
Large disclosed receipts can connect an outside spender to another organization. Some trails end at a nonprofit whose original donors may not be identifiable from these records.
2 outside spenders with qualifying organization receipts.
contribution · Amount received by the outside group, not attributed to this candidate.
affiliated transfer · Amount received by the outside group, not attributed to this candidate.
Outside spending is not automatically dark money. A Super PAC must disclose reportable donors, but a named donor may itself receive funds from undisclosed sources. Public filings cannot always identify the original person or organization behind the money.
We show documented receipts and independently matched nonprofit identities. We do not assign an outside group’s incoming money to a particular candidate or calculate a hidden-money total. Groups can fund multiple races, retain funds, or use receipts for other purposes. Original donors: not determined.
Read the matching rules and disclosure limits ↗2025–2026 receipts · Retrieved Sep 23, 2026. Source coverage and transaction categories can differ from outside-spending totals.
A personal check can come from an executive, a nurse, or a retiree. Employer and occupation disclosures add context to the individual-donation category.
These are individuals’ personal donations. An employer name does not mean the company paid, directed, or endorsed the contribution. Occupations are reported text, not a verified executive or lobbyist registry.
As reported by individual contributors
| Reported employer | Amount |
|---|---|
| SELF EMPLOYED | $61,774 |
| COMPASS OPERATING | $21,000 |
| RETIRED | $16,170 |
| NOT EMPLOYED | $15,421 |
| ARSENAL CAPITAL PARTNERS | $9,000 |
| ARNOLD VENTURES | $7,250 |
| ARC 57 | $7,000 |
| ASCO EQUIPMENT COMPANY | $7,000 |
| AUDAX GROUP | $7,000 |
| CHARLES POTOMAC CAPITAL, LLC | $7,000 |
| Other reported values | $488,073 |
| Missing / not provided | $477,057 |
As reported by individual contributors
| Reported occupation | Amount |
|---|---|
| RETIRED | $373,572 |
| EXECUTIVE | $58,150 |
| CEO | $55,773 |
| PRESIDENT | $28,910 |
| ATTORNEY | $28,785 |
| REAL ESTATE | $18,407 |
| OWNER | $17,500 |
| HOMEMAKER | $17,105 |
| MANAGER | $15,600 |
| NOT EMPLOYED | $15,421 |
| Other reported values | $391,087 |
| Missing / not provided | $103,435 |
Top reported values in the included itemized records; spelling variants can appear separately. These are two views of the same money and must not be added together. Positive entries: $1,230,175; negative adjustments: -$106,430. Unitemized donations have no employer or occupation breakdown here. Read coverage and exclusions ↗
FEC snapshot retrieved Sep 23, 2026 · Source archive last updated Sep 20, 2026. 1 campaign committee linked by FEC ID. Methodology ↗
Accountability coverage for Daniel Crenshaw. The same FEC matching rules apply to every candidate in the indexed financial snapshots. Records span years beyond the 2026 funding cycle. Campaign respondents and personal conduct are identified separately.
5,759 candidates checked · 7,669 FEC case titles scanned · retrieved Sep 15, 2026 · limited name matching
Campaign respondent: DAN CRENSHAW FOR CONGRESS C00660795 ↗
Matched by complete committee name, verified against the case respondent list. The legal index itself does not supply candidate IDs.Respondents: Dan Crenshaw for Congress; Kilgore, Paul
$42,000.00Penalty shown for this respondent group
These are the FEC’s disposition labels. Closing a file does not establish guilt; a “reason to believe” decision is a procedural threshold. Repeated amounts for the same respondent group are shown once. Amounts across case numbers can overlap and must not be added.
Source retrieved Sep 15, 2026. This index does not review later litigation, reopening, or enforcement of the agreement.
Partial review · includes broader investigations and context for selected FEC matters above · do not add these counts together
The agreement describes $207,360.20 in excessive contributions and $16,100 in apparent prohibited corporate and LLC contributions accepted by the campaign.
The FEC accepted a conciliation agreement requiring a $42,000 civil penalty, cessation of the violations, and compliance training for the treasurer. The file was closed.
$42,000Civil penalty agreed by campaign and treasurer
The respondent was the campaign and its treasurer, not Crenshaw personally. The agreement records refunds and redesignations, including later corrections. This was a civil settlement before a probable-cause finding, not a criminal conviction.
A civil matter resolved by agreement. Read the record for admissions, terms, and which respondent agreed.
All incoming funds, including transfers
Disbursements, including transfers
At the end of the reporting period
Outstanding reported obligations
Unitemized is a disclosure category, not a count of small donors.
Contributions exclude loans, transfers, and other receipts. Committee contributions include PACs and other political committees. See definitions ↗
These categories help explain why total receipts differ from contributions.
Receipts and spending can include money moved between a candidate’s own committees. Refunds are listed separately; contributions above are gross reported amounts.
The latest matching record from each of up to 12 committees, ordered by transaction date. Each amount is a single reported transaction, not that committee’s total giving. Filings may include amendments, memo entries, and negative adjustments.
| Reporting committee | Transaction date | Amount | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| CONSERVATIVE PROMISES PAC | Jun 17, 2026 | -$2,500 | Filing |
| PHILLIPS 66 PAC | May 11, 2026 | -$2,500 | Filing |
| MAJORITY COMMITTEE PAC--MC PAC | May 6, 2026 | -$5,000 | Filing |
| AMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE | Apr 28, 2026 | $5,000 | Filing |
| THE HOME DEPOT INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE | Apr 28, 2026 | -$2,500 | Filing |
| OVINTIV USA INC. PAC | Apr 24, 2026 | -$500 | Filing |
| HOUSTON PILOTS PAC | Apr 23, 2026 | -$3,300 | Filing |
| AMERICAN CHEMISTRY COUNCIL PAC | Apr 23, 2026 | -$5,000 | Filing |
| WITH HONOR PAC | Apr 22, 2026 | -$5,000 | Filing |
| CHEVRON EMPLOYEES POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE - CHEVRON CORPORATION | Apr 22, 2026 | -$2,500 | Filing |
| COLORADO WESTERN POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE | Apr 18, 2026 | -$1,500 | Filing |
| AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY PAC (HEARTPAC) | Mar 3, 2026 | $1,000 | Filing |
Source: FEC committee-to-candidate files, downloaded Sep 15, 2026. Reporting committee names come from the committee registry. These records exclude independent expenditures and do not reconcile to candidate-reported receipts. Selection methodology ↗