Reported through Jun 30, 2026. Snapshot downloaded Sep 15, 2026.View 2024 cycle →
BEYOND THE CAMPAIGN ACCOUNT · 2025–2026
The outside money
FEC processed filings
See what the campaign received alongside money other groups spent to elect or defeat Raphael Warnock.
Direct campaign contributions$2.5M
Received by the campaign
$2,482,764.24
Outside spending for$0
Spent to support this candidate
$0
Outside spending against$7.4K
Spent to oppose this candidate
$7,352.21
Separate measures, not an additive total. Campaign: reported through jun 30, 2026. Outside spending: processed periodic filings retrieved Sep 23, 2026; recent 24/48-hour notices may not yet appear. Amounts are net reported spending; negative amounts reflect reported adjustments.
Spends to support
No positive amounts matched in these processed filings.
Spends to oppose
Raphael WarnockTarget of outside spendingFunds stay outside the campaign
Select a group to inspect its spending. The map shows up to four leading spenders per position; the full list is below. Connections show the reported position, not money paid to the candidate.
All 1 outside spenders · exact amounts & sources
Outside spending by group for Raphael Warnock, 2026
Large disclosed receipts can connect an outside spender to another organization. Some trails end at a nonprofit whose original donors may not be identifiable from these records.
$1M+ receipt searchEach qualifying receipt meets this threshold. Smaller receipts and individual donors are outside this view.
No qualifying funding links matched in this snapshot.
This search is limited to large reported organization receipts. It does not establish that the spender’s funding is fully disclosed.
What this reveals about dark money
Outside spending is not automatically dark money. A Super PAC must disclose reportable donors, but a named donor may itself receive funds from undisclosed sources. Public filings cannot always identify the original person or organization behind the money.
We show documented receipts and independently matched nonprofit identities. We do not assign an outside group’s incoming money to a particular candidate or calculate a hidden-money total. Groups can fund multiple races, retain funds, or use receipts for other purposes. Original donors: not determined.
2025–2026 receipts · Retrieved Sep 23, 2026. Source coverage and transaction categories can differ from outside-spending totals.
INSIDE INDIVIDUAL DONATIONS
Who do individual donors work for?
Reported affiliations
A personal check can come from an executive, a nurse, or a retiree. Employer and occupation disclosures add context to the individual-donation category.
$1.3MIncluded itemized records · signed total
46,582Contribution records, not unique people
Jun 30, 2026Latest included transaction date
These are individuals’ personal donations. An employer name does not mean the company paid, directed, or endorsed the contribution. Occupations are reported text, not a verified executive or lobbyist registry.
Top reported values in the included itemized records; spelling variants can appear separately. These are two views of the same money and must not be added together. Positive entries: $1,340,897; negative adjustments: $0. Unitemized donations have no employer or occupation breakdown here. Read coverage and exclusions ↗
Accountability coverage for Raphael Warnock. The same FEC matching rules apply to every candidate in the indexed financial snapshots. Records span years beyond the 2026 funding cycle. Campaign respondents and personal conduct are identified separately.
5,759 candidates checked · 7,669 FEC case titles scanned · retrieved Sep 15, 2026 · limited name matching
Campaign respondent: WARNOCK FOR GEORGIA C00736876 ↗
Matched by complete committee name, verified against the case respondent list. The legal index itself does not supply candidate IDs.
Dismissed-Other
Respondents: Warnock for Georgia; Warnock, Raphael; Koob, Christopher
These are the FEC’s disposition labels. Closing a file does not establish guilt; a “reason to believe” decision is a procedural threshold. Repeated amounts for the same respondent group are shown once. Amounts across case numbers can overlap and must not be added.
Source retrieved Sep 15, 2026. This index does not review later litigation, reopening, or enforcement of the agreement.
Reviewed investigations & context
Supplementary source review
Broader investigations and case narratives have not been reviewed for this candidate.
This is a coverage gap, not a finding about their conduct. The same source standards apply to every candidate.
Reported receipts$2.6M
All incoming funds, including transfers
Reported spending$3.2M
Disbursements, including transfers
Cash on hand$4.1M
At the end of the reporting period
Debts owed$0
Outstanding reported obligations
WHERE CONTRIBUTIONS COME FROM
The funding mix
$2,482,764.24Total reported contributions
Individuals$2,407,264.2497.0%
Other political committees$75,5003.0%
The candidate$00.0%
Party committees$00.0%
Contributions exclude loans, transfers, and other receipts. Committee contributions include PACs and other political committees. See definitions ↗
BEYOND CONTRIBUTIONS
Loans, transfers & refunds
These categories help explain why total receipts differ from contributions.
Transfers from authorized committees
$103,004.12
Candidate loans
$0
Other loans
$0
Transfers to authorized committees
$0
Individual contribution refunds
-$213,611.53
Committee contribution refunds
-$1,725
Receipts and spending can include money moved between a candidate’s own committees. Refunds are listed separately; contributions above are gross reported amounts.
FOLLOW THE PAPER TRAIL
Committee contribution records
The latest matching record from each of up to 12 committees, ordered by transaction date. Each amount is a single reported transaction, not that committee’s total giving. Filings may include amendments, memo entries, and negative adjustments.
Recent committee contribution records for Raphael Warnock
Source: FEC committee-to-candidate files, downloaded Sep 15, 2026. Reporting committee names come from the committee registry. These records exclude independent expenditures and do not reconcile to candidate-reported receipts. Selection methodology ↗