Preparing the campaign financials.
Compare campaign funding and explore the organizations connected to each candidate.
Accountability coverage for Ammar Campa-Najjar. The same FEC matching rules apply to every candidate in the indexed financial snapshots. Records span years beyond the 2026 funding cycle. Campaign respondents and personal conduct are identified separately.
5,759 candidates checked · 7,669 FEC case titles scanned · retrieved Sep 15, 2026 · limited name matching
This search can miss secondary respondents, renamed committees, archived files, and personal cases. It does not cover every FEC enforcement program, criminal court, or ethics investigation. Missing coverage or no match is not a clean bill of health.
This is a coverage gap, not a finding about their conduct. The same source standards apply to every candidate.
Full contribution categories on the left. Selected corporation-connected PAC transactions on the right. The company identifies the PAC’s registered affiliation, not the source of every dollar.
PAC examples are selected from the latest matching transactions of up to eight corporation-connected committees; the map shows up to six. Latest nonpositive or explicitly voided records are omitted without substituting older records. Dotted lines are not weighted by dollars. Corporate PAC contributions are separate from employees’ personal contributions. Graph methodology ↗
See what the campaign received alongside money other groups spent to elect or defeat Ammar Campa-Najjar.
Received by the campaign
$4,771.89Spent to support this candidate
$735,161.41Spent to oppose this candidate
$2,483,997.4Separate measures, not an additive total. Campaign: reported through feb 18, 2025. Outside spending: processed periodic filings retrieved Sep 23, 2026; recent 24/48-hour notices may not yet appear. Amounts are net reported spending; negative amounts reflect reported adjustments.
Select a group to inspect its spending. The map shows up to four leading spenders per position; the full list is below. Connections show the reported position, not money paid to the candidate.
| Spender | Supports | Opposes | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| DMFI PAC | $0 | $2,000,000 | FEC records |
| VOTEVETS | $443,773.54 | $0 | FEC records |
| HEALTH CARE SAVES LIVES | $0 | $323,322.55 | FEC records |
| SERVING CA | $291,387.87 | $0 | FEC records |
| CRUSH MAGA PAC | $0 | $160,674.85 | FEC records |
Large disclosed receipts can connect an outside spender to another organization. Some trails end at a nonprofit whose original donors may not be identifiable from these records.
2 outside spenders with qualifying organization receipts.
other receipt · Amount received by the outside group, not attributed to this candidate.
other receipt · Amount received by the outside group, not attributed to this candidate.
Outside spending is not automatically dark money. A Super PAC must disclose reportable donors, but a named donor may itself receive funds from undisclosed sources. Public filings cannot always identify the original person or organization behind the money.
We show documented receipts and independently matched nonprofit identities. We do not assign an outside group’s incoming money to a particular candidate or calculate a hidden-money total. Groups can fund multiple races, retain funds, or use receipts for other purposes. Original donors: not determined.
Read the matching rules and disclosure limits ↗2025–2026 receipts · Retrieved Sep 23, 2026. Source coverage and transaction categories can differ from outside-spending totals.
A personal check can come from an executive, a nurse, or a retiree. Employer and occupation disclosures add context to the individual-donation category.
Missing affiliations do not establish grassroots funding or an absence of executive or industry support.
FEC snapshot retrieved Sep 23, 2026 · Source archive last updated Sep 20, 2026. 1 campaign committee linked by FEC ID. Methodology ↗
Includes primary filings and candidates who may have withdrawn. Senate filings can include different contests in the same state. Consult state election officials for the certified ballot.
| Candidate | Party | Contributions in 2026 | Reporting coverage | Explore |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brandon Riker | Democrat | $1,148,678.58 | Reported through Jun 30, 2026 | MapProfile |
| Jim Desmond | Republican | $2,169,457.38 | Reported through Jun 30, 2026 | MapProfile |
| Marni Von Wilpert | Democrat | $2,129,855.57 | Reported through Jun 30, 2026 | MapProfile |
| Darrell Issa | Republican | $1,162,927.24 | Reported through Jun 30, 2026 | MapProfile |
| Abel Chavez | Democrat | $432,451.13 | Reported through Jun 30, 2026 | MapProfile |
| Anuj Dixit | Democrat | $464,682.5 | Reported through Jun 30, 2026 | MapProfile |
| Ferguson Porter | Democrat | $42,563 | Reported through Sep 30, 2025 | MapProfile |
| Marc Iannarino | Democrat | $43,424 | Reported through May 21, 2026 | MapProfile |
| Corinna Contreras | Democrat | $35,494.97 | Reported through Jun 30, 2026 | MapProfile |
| Curtis Morrison | Democrat | $35,553 | Reported through Feb 23, 2026 | MapProfile |
| Suzanne Marie Dr. Till | Democrat | $6,853.53 | Reported through Dec 4, 2025 | MapProfile |
| Ammar Campa-Najjar | Democrat | $4,771.89 | Reported through Feb 18, 2025 | MapProfile |