Changing the funding cycle follows the same FEC candidate ID.
BEYOND THE FUNDING TOTAL
Accountability record
Accountability coverage for Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. The same FEC matching rules apply to every candidate in the indexed financial snapshots. Records span years beyond the 2024 funding cycle. Campaign respondents and personal conduct are identified separately.
5,759 candidates checked · 7,669 FEC case titles scanned · retrieved Sep 15, 2026 · limited name matching
Campaign respondent: ALEXANDRIA OCASIO-CORTEZ FOR CONGRESS C00639591 ↗
Matched by complete committee name, verified against the case respondent list. The legal index itself does not supply candidate IDs.
No Reason to Believe
Respondents: Llewellyn, Frank; Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez for Congress; Brand New Congress; Enad, Hosseh; Brand New Congress, LLC; Chakrabarti, Saikat; Ocasio-Cortez, Alexandria; Roberts, Riley
These are the FEC’s disposition labels. Closing a file does not establish guilt; a “reason to believe” decision is a procedural threshold. Repeated amounts for the same respondent group are shown once. Amounts across case numbers can overlap and must not be added.
Source retrieved Sep 15, 2026. This index does not review later litigation, reopening, or enforcement of the agreement.
Reviewed investigations & context
Supplementary source review
Partial review · includes broader investigations and context for selected FEC matters above · do not add these counts together
House Committee on Ethics · House Report 119-219
Gift-rule finding with conditional corrective payments
Official finding
Action date
Jul 25, 2025
Conduct period
2021 Met Gala
Who the record concerns
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, personally
Conduct described in the record
The Committee found she did not fully comply with the Gift Rule: her then-partner’s free admission was impermissible and some goods were not paid for at fair-market value.
Outcome / procedural status
The report required an additional $2,733.28 payment to Brother Vellies and a $250 donation to the Costume Institute. It said no sanction was merited if these payments were made, with closure upon confirmation.
The Committee found no evidence she intentionally underpaid and credited her efforts to comply and reliance on counsel. The sources reviewed do not confirm the required payments or a later closure; corrective payments are not a civil fine.
What “official finding” means
An authority reached the finding described in the record. Its scope and evidentiary standard matter.
THE FUNDING CONNECTIONS · 2023–2024
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s funding map
Full contribution categories on the left. Selected corporation-connected PAC transactions on the right. The company identifies the PAC’s registered affiliation, not the source of every dollar.
Solid lines: contribution totalsDotted lines: one transaction per PACReported through Dec 31, 2024
Individuals contributed more than political committees.Individuals $14,866,494.81 / Other political committees $44,882.58. The committee category includes more than company PACs.
PAC examples are selected from the latest matching transactions of up to eight corporation-connected committees; the map shows up to six. Latest nonpositive or explicitly voided records are omitted without substituting older records. Dotted lines are not weighted by dollars. Corporate PAC contributions are separate from employees’ personal contributions. Graph methodology ↗
A DIFFERENT MONEY TRAIL
Outside spending & dark money
Original donors: not determined
Independent expenditures support or oppose a candidate. This money is spent outside the campaign and is not paid to the candidate. These examples do not measure a “dark money” total.
What this can—and cannot—tell you about dark money
Some outside groups may receive funds whose original donors cannot be identified from these public records. Outside spending is not automatically dark money; a Super PAC or nonprofit label alone does not prove undisclosed funding. We do not classify donors’ disclosure status or estimate a hidden-dollar amount.
Amounts above are the latest dated example per spender and support/oppose position, not cumulative totals. Latest nonpositive or explicitly voided records are omitted without substituting older records. Amendments and memo entries are retained, not fully reconciled. Read the disclosure limits ↗
Includes primary filings and candidates who may have withdrawn. Senate filings can include different contests in the same state. Consult state election officials for the certified ballot.