Changing the funding cycle follows the same FEC candidate ID.
BEYOND THE FUNDING TOTAL
Accountability record
Accountability coverage for Rafael Edward Ted Cruz. The same FEC matching rules apply to every candidate in the indexed financial snapshots. Records span years beyond the 2024 funding cycle. Campaign respondents and personal conduct are identified separately.
5,759 candidates checked · 7,669 FEC case titles scanned · retrieved Sep 15, 2026 · limited name matching
Campaign respondent: TED CRUZ FOR SENATE C00492785 ↗
Matched by complete committee name, verified against the case respondent list. The legal index itself does not supply candidate IDs.
No Reason to Believe
Take No Further Action
Respondents: Knippa, Bradley S.; Ted Cruz for Senate; Cruz, Rafael Edward "Ted"
These are the FEC’s disposition labels. Closing a file does not establish guilt; a “reason to believe” decision is a procedural threshold. Repeated amounts for the same respondent group are shown once. Amounts across case numbers can overlap and must not be added.
These are the FEC’s disposition labels. Closing a file does not establish guilt; a “reason to believe” decision is a procedural threshold. Repeated amounts for the same respondent group are shown once. Amounts across case numbers can overlap and must not be added.
Partial review · includes broader investigations and context for selected FEC matters above · do not add these counts together
Federal Election Commission · MUR 8238
Podcast-revenue complaint was dismissed
Dismissed
Action date
Jan 14, 2025
Conduct period
2023–2024 payments; complaint filed April 2024
Who the record concerns
Ted Cruz; Truth and Courage PAC; Kris Ozanus, as treasurer
Conduct described in the record
Campaign Legal Center and End Citizens United alleged that Cruz unlawfully directed iHeart-related podcast revenue to Truth and Courage PAC and that the PAC misreported the payments.
Outcome / procedural status
The FEC voted 5–1 to dismiss both allegations and close the file. This matter did not result in a violation finding or civil penalty.
The adopted analysis said the record did not appear to show Cruz solicited or directed the payments and treated them as commercial payments. This dismissal must accompany any account of the complaint.
What “dismissed” means
The authority closed or dismissed the allegations described. The specific grounds, rather than the label alone, explain the outcome.
Campaign misreported the source of bank-financed loans
Civil settlement
Action date
Feb 20, 2019
Conduct period
2012 Senate campaign
Who the record concerns
Ted Cruz for Senate and Bradley S. Knippa, as treasurer
Conduct described in the record
The campaign reported $1,064,000 in loans as Cruz’s personal funds, omitting the required disclosure that Goldman Sachs and Citibank were the underlying lenders.
Outcome / procedural status
The campaign and treasurer agreed to a $35,000 civil penalty and to correct the reports. The FEC accepted the agreement and closed the consolidated matters.
$35,000Civil penalty agreed by campaign and treasurer
This was a reporting violation by the campaign and treasurer. The FEC separately found no reason to believe Cruz personally violated the reporting provisions. The campaign described the omission as inadvertent.
What “civil settlement” means
A civil matter resolved by agreement. Read the record for admissions, terms, and which respondent agreed.
THE FUNDING CONNECTIONS · 2023–2024
Rafael Edward Ted Cruz’s funding map
Full contribution categories on the left. Selected corporation-connected PAC transactions on the right. The company identifies the PAC’s registered affiliation, not the source of every dollar.
Solid lines: contribution totalsDotted lines: one transaction per PACReported through Dec 31, 2024
Individuals contributed more than political committees.Individuals $67,435,723.31 / Other political committees $1,262,520.07. The committee category includes more than company PACs.
PAC examples are selected from the latest matching transactions of up to eight corporation-connected committees; the map shows up to six. Latest nonpositive or explicitly voided records are omitted without substituting older records. Dotted lines are not weighted by dollars. Corporate PAC contributions are separate from employees’ personal contributions. Graph methodology ↗
A DIFFERENT MONEY TRAIL
Outside spending & dark money
Original donors: not determined
Independent expenditures support or oppose a candidate. This money is spent outside the campaign and is not paid to the candidate. These examples do not measure a “dark money” total.
What this can—and cannot—tell you about dark money
Some outside groups may receive funds whose original donors cannot be identified from these public records. Outside spending is not automatically dark money; a Super PAC or nonprofit label alone does not prove undisclosed funding. We do not classify donors’ disclosure status or estimate a hidden-dollar amount.
Amounts above are the latest dated example per spender and support/oppose position, not cumulative totals. Latest nonpositive or explicitly voided records are omitted without substituting older records. Amendments and memo entries are retained, not fully reconciled. Read the disclosure limits ↗
Includes primary filings and candidates who may have withdrawn. Senate filings can include different contests in the same state. Consult state election officials for the certified ballot.